Reflections on AI in Education: A Path Forward

Last Friday, May 16, I attended the 16th Innotech International Conference of SEAMEO at the Manila Hotel. Its theme, “AI in Education: Unlocking Potential Through Accessible and Equitable Learning,” struck a particularly resonant chord. This is a subject of vital interest to us at the Government Academe Industry Network (GAIN), as we consistently explore how technological advancements can be integrated to benefit our educational ecosystem. I was made aware of the conference by my friend and fellow WomenBizPH member, former DTI Usec. Nora Terrado. I am glad I attended as I was the sole representative from GAIN there.

SEAMEO INNOTECH, an organization with a distinguished history since its inception in 1970, continues to play a crucial role in addressing the educational needs of Southeast Asia. The conference was well-attended, drawing over 400 participants from across the region, including government officials, educators, innovators, and representatives from various international organizations. I had the distinct pleasure of conversing with Philip Purnell, a former leader in Educational Research and Innovation at SEAMEO INNOTECH. We traded stories of life after retirement and reflection on what was being discussed at the conference.

Several key themes emerged throughout the proceedings. First is the critical importance of ensuring that AI is accessible and equitable for all learners, regardless of geographical or economic disparities. Secondly, the need for a human-centric approach to AI implementation was emphasized, recognizing that technology is a tool to enhance, not replace, the invaluable role of educators. We also discussed the dual nature of AI, acknowledging its potential while being mindful of its limitations and potential risks. Ethical considerations in the use of AI, regional collaboration, and the development of policy frameworks to bridge theory and practice were other essential points of discussion.

Plenary discussion on advancing AI integration in education | Photo: Monette Iturralde-Hamlin

One of the conference’s objectives was to refine policies for the ethical and inclusive adoption of AI. The presentation of the Regional AI in Education Policy Framework by INNOTECH Centre Deputy Director Ms. Kochakorn Khattapan Acidre was particularly enlightening. It underscored the necessity of collaborative efforts among SEAMEO member nations. Furthermore, Ambassador Dato’ Abdul Malik Melvin Castellino Anthony of Malaysia reminded us of the irreplaceable human element in education, especially regarding socio-emotional development and critical thinking, qualities AI alone cannot impart.

Mr. Purnell astutely noted the need for inclusivity in the framework and the consideration of AI’s environmental impact. For my part, I voiced my apprehensions about the ethical implications of AI. Education Secretary Sonny Angara’s emphasis on strengthening foundational literacy and numeracy before introducing AI to young children was particularly wise. This foundational approach aligns with our understanding that critical thinking and problem-solving skills are built upon solid fundamental knowledge. The digital divide in the Philippines, with limited internet access in many schools, adds a layer of complexity to the adoption of AI.

Dr. Tara Betellie of the World Bank shared pertinent observations on the importance of fostering self-regulation and critical thinking in learners, rather than an over-reliance on AI. This aligns with my own recollections of college days where computational skills were diligently honed without the aid of modern tools. I left the conference with a renewed understanding of AI’s potential in education and a firm belief in the value of regional policy development. AI is undoubtedly a significant part of our future, and it is our responsibility to ensure it is used to benefit the coming generations while mitigating any risks.

Read also

Chris Layugan